Title: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5.17 Post by: Michael Martin on April 01, 2004, 10:39:36 am The core team has been quite busy these past few weeks, but we're starting to get our acts together again as deadlines pass. Just in time, too -- a group of shadowy coders calling themselves The Starfire Group has contacted us, with a large number of patches, and even some new original content.
Notable patches include:
I can say, in all honesty, that every line of code that I've seen from Starfire is of the highest quality. I'm putting my own project of preparing online input configuration on hold for a bit just to try to integrate some of these patches in and try them out. Until next time, I remain... Michael Martin Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: TiLT on April 01, 2004, 01:17:35 pm Wow! Finally the UQM team is making changes for the better.
:P Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Megagun on April 01, 2004, 06:58:18 pm Nice :)
Seems like the Orz have come to the starbase, if you know what i mean.. ;) Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: FalconMWC on April 01, 2004, 07:15:59 pm Great! - Cloaking device, here I come! - Do you by any chance know how you get it? Like is there a side quest or do you just pick it up?
Anyways - Great work!!!! ;) Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Fsi-Dib on April 02, 2004, 12:51:26 am Does it include an interview with Paul Reiche and Fred Ford?
Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Culture20 on April 02, 2004, 01:10:38 am According to their readme, Groombridge is in the works; they just need up to date pictures of their heads.
Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Chrispy on April 02, 2004, 02:48:21 am That sounds awsome. I have two questions
When can this be expected to be accesable? Do the starfire group have any other accomplishments? Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Kaiser on April 02, 2004, 06:31:58 am *hopes people realized it was an April Fools Day joke...*
Though the thrusters and cloaking device would be nice. :P Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: ShofixtiWithAK-47 on April 02, 2004, 08:03:49 am Which would suck completely.
But- A rated M version of Sc2? That's pretty exciting. Swearing VUX, Kohr-ah chewing on corpses? Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Chrispy on April 02, 2004, 08:14:38 am And Talana oh my
Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Culture20 on April 02, 2004, 09:59:07 am Quote *hopes people realized it was an April Fools Day joke...* I don't know if non European or American countries observe April Fools' Day. Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Megagun on April 02, 2004, 07:00:39 pm hey, it wouldhave been nice if those stuff were added, though ;)
It would have been a better joke if he said that TFB said that they were going to help in creating Sc4/Real Sc3.. ;) ohwell... Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Captain Smith on April 02, 2004, 09:46:16 pm Quote One member of Starfire notes that the rules of the ESRB would place UQM in the 'M' category for language and suggestive themes, but with a few small modifications, it could be rated the more family-friendly "K-A" as well. As we'd like to see as many people as possible enjoy The Ur-Quan Masters, we've decided to include the patches they submitted. There will, of course, be a command-line option which will enable the full content. The "child-safe" mode will have some of the VUX and Shofixti insults blanked out, and all Pkunk insults except for "dummy", "baby", and "dodo" will be disabled. Yes it's a very good joke and saw right through it right away. However, good comedy always has its basis in reality and they did a great job here. To point this thing out, I didn't think about it before I read the quote above, but if we were to apply an ESRB rating to UQM, it probably would get a T or a MA, not necessarily for the Pkunk stuff. I can think of the Syreen thing and one of the Shofixti insults (about hanging reproductive organs) that would probably put it out of the K-A designation. I know personally I wouldn't want a 10 y/o playing the game. Seriously, has this been an issue talked about, or would it even be worth trying to get an ESRB rating on the game? Or would it not even be an issue on the table? Just stuff to think about. Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Ivan Ivanov on April 03, 2004, 02:01:06 am Quote I know personally I wouldn't want a 10 y/o playing the game. Oh come on! I was 8 when I started playing the game. There is no Faul Language (tm) in it, sex and all references to it are nothing compared to what you can see on TV. I must admit that I don't understand the rating system, because there is nothing similiar in my country, but saying it's not appropriate for children... please! Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Captain Smith on April 03, 2004, 02:35:48 am The rating system is there for concern of parents on what their children see. In a lot of ways, people in this country are more "uptight" as you would say about this kind of thing. In fact, the gaming community at large got in such trouble over content in games that they had to form the ESRB and rank games and control them (kids in most spots can't legally buy games rated MA) or the government was going to step in and do it for them.
Speaking of UQM, I would have guessed it to be a T, but according to this, it's ranked as an E (by indication of what Star Control 2 was ranked). However I do know some people who would be offended if their kids played the game. http://www.esrb.org/search_results.asp?key=Star+Control&type=game Quote I must admit that I don't understand the rating system, because there is nothing similiar in my country, but saying it's not appropriate for children... please! Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Fsi-Dib on April 03, 2004, 11:52:33 pm If not native to english language, a 8 y/o kid won't understand the text so well... applied to me at least.
I would give it just a minor sticker. They don't show naughty bits or blood, and it's enough for me. Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: 1_Terminator on April 05, 2004, 04:21:08 am Quote Yes it's a very good joke and saw right through it right away. However, good comedy always has its basis in reality and they did a great job here. To point this thing out, I didn't think about it before I read the quote above, but if we were to apply an ESRB rating to UQM, it probably would get a T or a MA, not necessarily for the Pkunk stuff. I can think of the Syreen thing and one of the Shofixti insults (about hanging reproductive organs) that would probably put it out of the K-A designation. I know personally I wouldn't want a 10 y/o playing the game. Seriously, has this been an issue talked about, or would it even be worth trying to get an ESRB rating on the game? Or would it not even be an issue on the table? Just stuff to think about. ESRB is overrated I remember Twised Metal (the first one) had a rating of T "Animated Violence(no shit)"solely because of the describtion of daskside being from Hell, insidentally using the words "Hell, damn, or freaking" automaticly puts the game in at least the Teen catagory. Metroid Zero mission is rated E but has a sub-title "Fantasy Violence" all Rpg's "Violence". Games like Castlevania Lament of Inosence and the Resident Evil series are rated M for Blood and Gore. In all seriousness yes their should be a warning on games with blood gore etc., but their should not be an age restriction, usless in unique situations where certain things are banned by law like porno etc. When I first played RE2 it scared the hell out of me and one scene still does even though I know it's coming. About someone younger than 10 playing it I doubt anyone that young would enjoy it(patience) and the sexual comments made by you and Talana would be missed by someone of that age(go right over their head)any rating higher than Teen is unwarranted. Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Chrispy on April 05, 2004, 05:17:07 am When your really little it is possible to be mildly warped by the words hell, freaking or dammit. Also sexual comments if not missed can be bad for little kids. Its better to be safe than sorry.
Everyones talking about the syreen and shofixti. What about the slylandro and their glowy things out in the open. Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: Sage on April 05, 2004, 07:53:02 am I've never really understood the need for age-rating systems on video games. The fact that a government standard assumes that mental maturity increases with physical maturity shows that somebody wasn't thinking properly in the first place. Besides, if any human (child or no) can be supposedly warped by simple words, then they weren't really warped by them at all, and were already so prior to hearing such things.
Blood and gore I can understand increasing a rating over. I can even understand it when sexual situations are involved, but language? It doesn't matter how much you censor the material that a child views, eventually he or she will be exposed to those words and ideas, and will have to deal with them. Besides, teaching children that they are "naughty words" gives them a distorted view of the language. After all, those "naughty words" sure do get uttered a lot. What's the point in not using those words if the ideas that they convey can be easily duplicated with other words? It makes no sense to me. Er, oops...I unintentionally turned that into a rant. Oh well...*posts* Title: Re: The Council of Starfire - The Road to 0.4, #5. Post by: FalconMWC on April 06, 2004, 12:28:36 am Well I think that they are trying to limit the contact of swearing with younger children. I know that I would take a swear word differently if I was 10 when I heard it as opposed to now.
|