Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
|
2
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / Starbase Café / Re: Pandora handheld
|
on: January 19, 2011, 10:23:27 pm
|
Emulation on a DS works fairly nicely, with the one exception of the odd screen size. Depending on the game, you either need to leave black bars on the sides, or crop off the top/bottom of the screen a little. It's not terrible, though.
Edit: well, at least, nes, snes, and scumm emulation works well. I haven't tried much of anything else, really.
|
|
|
8
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / General UQM Discussion / Re: Project6014 demo release
|
on: October 19, 2010, 11:30:53 pm
|
Someone let that redditer who got a zeroed blue channel know about the 'full screen' fix...
Yes, please! If someone's got an account, could you inform at Reddit that on OSX the colors work correctly in fullscreen mode. (I couldn't for some reason make an account at Reddit with any browser, the joys of OSX I guess ) I seem to have built the app against bogus SDL/SDL_image frameworks... using different version of them in the .app fixed the color issue. I'll use the better frameworks in the 0.1.1. release! I let them know.
|
|
|
10
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / General UQM Discussion / Re: Project6014 demo release
|
on: October 03, 2010, 08:54:20 pm
|
Use something like TortoiseSVN to do an SVN checkout.
While we are obliged to make the source code available, we hope that the general public will respect our wishes to not go poking around. This makes it hard to keep things a surprise for al the people who want to be surprises. So I ask eveyone, please do not go poking around in there, and please do not encourage others to poke around in there. We would like to keep things under wraps as much as we can. The whole point of this project is to surprise the community with somethign enw and cool. It would be a shame if we lost power over this and the general public went in there and revealed new images and the like In order to play it on linux, we have to download and compile ourselves, though, right?
|
|
|
11
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / General UQM Discussion / Re: Project 6014 – Ur-Quan Masters mod
|
on: September 27, 2010, 01:24:42 am
|
What if they're, ahem, attracted to their own sex? Off-topic, I know. Yay, the 30th is coming soon Didn't there used to be a lesbian that posted on here? Is she still around? Or maybe it was a gay guy. I don't remember now, all I remember was wondering why it was brought up. And the ladies play this game for Zex and Hayes, if I understand correctly. Why Zex, I'll never know.
|
|
|
14
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / Starbase Café / Re: What'd I miss?
|
on: September 21, 2010, 05:35:48 am
|
This forum comes up to 10, maybe 15% of the insanity of some forums I'm on. Don't worry guys, I love you all anyway.
I don't mean that the board itself is insane. It seems pretty laid back right now, and when I was here before. I meant that the posters are insane, more than the posts themselves. Nothing particularly insane happened on the board with shiver, but him leaving like that is kinda insane. Am I wording what I mean to say correctly?
|
|
|
15
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / Starbase Café / Re: revitalizing the forum
|
on: September 21, 2010, 05:31:53 am
|
Why do you need other people to share their opinions in order to defend yours? Ummm... Morale..? What can I say, I can get discouraged if I'm "debating" with a mountain of people whose stances on the matter are all opposite to mine. It's something psychological, I suspect. At that point, I lose my will to continue. If it was just myself versus one other person, that'd be fine, but I felt quite overwhelmed by the opposition. So if you feel your stance on an issue is correct, but you're in the minority, then you can't discuss it? It looks like if you had a good arguement, it wouldn't matter how many people opposed it, it'd still be a good arguement. Is your morale low because the other side's argument doesn't make any sense and is frustrating you, or because it's a good one? As far as I'm concerned, it's a debate as long as both sides are presenting valid arguements and counterpoints and such, and stops being a debate when it degenerates to personal attacks. It didn't really seem like either side was getting personally attacked at all. Why do you feel the need to put "debating" in quotes?
|
|
|
|
|