|
1
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / Starbase Café / Re: 3DO ISO Extractor...
|
on: July 24, 2021, 04:16:12 pm
|
|
Started by Serosis | Last post by liam
|
|
When I download 3DO ROMs in winrar format and unzipped them and put them in the RretroArch emulator, the unzipped file can't be found. I put the games in the folder named ROMs, start the emulator but there are not showing the games I put in the folder. what is the problem RetroArch doesn't support 3DO ROMs or something else.
|
|
|
3
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / General UQM Discussion / Re: How to add starbase
|
on: July 23, 2021, 08:28:05 am
|
|
Started by *Happy Camper* | Last post by Serosis
|
Not without knowing exactly what you need.
Like, do you want one in a star system that has no relation to the plot or do you want to add in starbases for races that don't have them?
I ask because, for the most part, all the planets and moons are procedurally generated by default except for plot specific code that overrides it.
It's much easier to plunk new objects down if you can piggyback off of the plot code like I did in MegaMod.
Saves from having to create new .c/.h files and remembering to tie them into the makefile structure for both GCC and Visual Studio.
Probably would be easier to explain by adding a starbase to a star completely at random then you showing you the work.
I'll be back in about an hour, maybe more depending on how detailed I want to get.
EDIT:
I'll also add comments to code to explain what I'm changing
UPDATE:
This github commit details the basics on how to add a destroyed Starbase to a star system along with planetary ruins and unique lander reports for both.
For purposes of my own I used the Microscopii star system
https://github.com/Serosis/uqm/commit/5aace8e27b77d0bdb1012b10798249f45487fa44
|
|
|
4
|
The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release / General UQM Discussion / Re: Stardock Litigation Discussion
|
on: July 23, 2021, 01:10:44 am
|
|
Started by Elestan | Last post by Elestan
|
|
...they attempted theft and the destruction of online communities who objected...
Which communities did they destroy?
They did say "attempted", and the legal relief requested in Stardock's legal filings did include an injunction that could have required the UQM project to shut down. That's enough to count, IMHO.
[EDIT]: Parsed a little more closely, the 'attempted' might be read to apply only to 'theft' and not 'destruction', but that may be a little too pedantic of a parse. In any event, no actual community destruction occurred.
|
|
|
