The Ur-Quan Masters Home Page Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 29, 2022, 02:16:10 pm
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Paul & Fred have reached a settlement with Stardock!

+  The Ur-Quan Masters Discussion Forum
|-+  The Ur-Quan Masters Re-Release
| |-+  General UQM Discussion (Moderator: Death 999)
| | |-+  One year since April 16 2006
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: One year since April 16 2006  (Read 3942 times)
Neonlare
*Smell* controller
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 277


Nut Case for Star Control


View Profile
Re: One year since April 16 2006
« Reply #15 on: April 18, 2007, 08:24:15 pm »

In honesty, I think Star Control is tuned into Nintendo's Audience. XBox tends to have the "Xtreme" audience thing going for it and Sony have the "Super Gritty Brown" stuff (both sterotypes). Nintendo tend to produce games with a Deep Plot, but add some surreal humour to it and such (Whoever says Mario isn't a parody is LYIIIIING).

But yes, hopefully, IF they port the Genesis version, they'll add Blast Processing Smiley. Hopefully.
Logged

"would newton's law theory actually work if a Chmmr Avatar did a backwards pelvic thrust towards a planet and would this constitute an X=Y-0 in the part it ran straight into a Supox Blade and lasted long enough to survive?" - Elerium (as Valaggar)
Grakelin
Frungy champion
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 68



View Profile
Re: One year since April 16 2006
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2007, 08:49:01 pm »

What exactly is Mario a parody of? Fat plumbers who ride dinosaurs?
Logged
Neonlare
*Smell* controller
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 277


Nut Case for Star Control


View Profile
Re: One year since April 16 2006
« Reply #17 on: April 22, 2007, 09:01:40 pm »

It's a parody of the "one man army thing" that was going on in the cinemas, originaly he was a Carpenter, but he basically parodies the idea that there has to be a really cool guy to be the hero, with sword/beams/etc.
Logged

"would newton's law theory actually work if a Chmmr Avatar did a backwards pelvic thrust towards a planet and would this constitute an X=Y-0 in the part it ran straight into a Supox Blade and lasted long enough to survive?" - Elerium (as Valaggar)
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!