Cedric6014
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 701
|
I predict that Valaggar will be the forum's top poster by 8 January next year.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Galvennmeister
Guest
|
In fect, with heas carrent spead of 3 posts a dai (whats displeyed in heas sammary is calcyulated starting from the biginning; before Miip-iip sent him a message at my saggestion, he was posting muche faster), by 971 days he will be the top poster. So, in June 2010. You see, just becose he is sage in interdiminsional fatigu, he steel has to obay da rulez.
PS. Sawrry for me english, im bad.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cedric6014
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 701
|
Your math is bad too
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Galvennmeister
Guest
|
No, is not. Death 999 is carrent top poster, and hass 2339 posts and 1.5 posts a dai. Vallagger hass 885 posts and 3 posts a dai (ricently). Dhen calcyulate in 971 dais: 2339+(1.5*971)=3795.5; 885+(3*971)=3798; da dai bifore he hass lais dhan D999. Dis fast posting is becos of interdiminsional fatigu, he gets many Thallium from other diminsion and makes it into posts.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cedric6014
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 701
|
Valaggar posts around 7 per day
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Galvennmeister
Guest
|
<Valaggar hijacks Galvennmeister's account> No, I don't do this anymore. Try looking at my last posts (about since 28 April) and you can calculate that the average is 3 posts per day. <Galvennmeister returns> Vallagger is EVIL! Why did he hijeck me acount?!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Valaggar
Guest
|
We should have kept meeps old titles, just for you. What were those? 5 stars - "Vandal" 4 stars - "Spammer" 3 stars - "Troll" 2 stars - "Forumer" 1 star - "Genius" I think Meep didn't like to be called "Vandal".
And then of course, there is always the question of quantity versus quality. That's why I post less now. I prefer quality.
P.S.: Sorry for using my own account for this post, but Galvennmeister has changed his password and it will take some days for me to discover it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valaggar
Guest
|
I think it's called the SCDB.
And then of course, there is always the question of quantity versus quality.
To me, SCDB looks (in the recent times, some time ago it didn't use to be like that from what I can tell by browsing its archives) poor both in quality and in quantity.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|