Pages: [1] 2
|
|
|
Poll
|
Question: |
Does this sound rediculous to you?
Yes. It makes no sense at all. |
|
5 (55.6%) |
Mostly, but it kind of makes sense. |
|
3 (33.3%) |
A little, but it mostly makes sense. |
|
0 (0%) |
No, it makes perfect sense. |
|
1 (11.1%) |
|
|
Total Voters: 9 |
|
Author
|
Topic: "Low quality sounds damage ears" - Do you think this sounds rediculous? (Read 5827 times)
|
jaychant
*Smell* controller
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 432
Please visit my homepage
|
My Geo-Physics teacher once said something that I now think sounds totally ridiculous. He claimed that "low-quality" sounds actually damage your ears, defining "low quality" as being for example headphones/earbuds instead of normal speakers.
Do you think that this sounds ridiculous?
I think it sounds ridiculous, but I thought I'd ask the older and wiser nerds from the UQM fan club.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dragon
Frungy champion
Offline
Posts: 86
|
That sounds (haha) like it's right up there with wooden volume knobs affecting sound fidelity.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Draxas
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1044
|
The damage you do to your hearing with headphones / earbuds isn't from "low quality" or any other kind of bunk; it's from too high volume for extended periods of time. Keep the volume on your MP3 players to a reasonable level, kids, and your hearing will thank you later.
***The More You Know!***
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arne
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 520
Yak!
|
Perhaps the type of noise you listen to does matter at higher volumes though? Different sounds might put the ear drums under different kinds of stress. The type of music you listen to probably matters more than the quality of the sound, so don't listen to low quality music
|
|
« Last Edit: May 28, 2009, 11:31:15 am by Arne »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AngusThermopyle
*Smell* controller
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 304
A paranoid android.
|
Perhaps when he was referring to quality, he was actually referring to genre. For example, perhaps he believes that a "low quality" genre of music (such as heavy metal or rap) is more damaging on your ears than "high quality" music (such as classical) at equal decibel levels.
In any case, I think you need to get some clarification as to what he actually meant.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death 999
Global Moderator
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3874
We did. You did. Yes we can. No.
|
I expect they're half-deaf already. That's why they have it up that high.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draxas
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1044
|
Probably. It's a vicious cycle that perpetuates itself until you can't hear anything.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jaychant
*Smell* controller
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 432
Please visit my homepage
|
The damage you do to your hearing with headphones / earbuds isn't from "low quality" or any other kind of bunk; it's from too high volume for extended periods of time. Keep the volume on your MP3 players to a reasonable level, kids, and your hearing will thank you later.
***The More You Know!***
There is a vocational school on my bus route so at times I share the bus with 15-18 year old boys and girls. It's amazing what kind of volume they squeeze out of those earbuds. Sitting several seats away, I can still hear the music just as well as if it was on loudspeaker. Sometimes I'll get a sensory overload because there are five different kids with five different songs playing around me. It saddens me that they're probably all going to be half deaf in a decade, but what can you do? They have volume set to max (or close to it). I don't understand this either. For me, if the volume is much more than half max, it starts to hurt my ears. My guess is that they go to too many live performances (concerts), or another possibility is that they want to drown out all sound around them.
Perhaps when he was referring to quality, he was actually referring to genre. For example, perhaps he believes that a "low quality" genre of music (such as heavy metal or rap) is more damaging on your ears than "high quality" music (such as classical) at equal decibel levels. While the music he listens to is boring by my standards, he doesn't listen to classical. He listens to old rock (classic rock?) music.
He made a claim that most of the concerts he had been to, at bars, were "low quality" and he also said that headphones are "low quality". He never said that his rock-and-roll music was bad quality and he never said that classical music was good quality. In fact, besides the fact that he listened to rock-and-roll, he didn't mention genre at all.
Jaychant, what you teacher might have been refering to is a badly encoded MP3 which makes those ****ing horrible (and very loud) popping sounds; that could count as low quality.... Also google "idiot audiophiles" for the wooden knob thing. There's this strange and bizarre sub culture of sound fanatics who believe that one can get better sounds by painting arrows on audio cables to massage the electrons or that by using wooden volume dials one creates less harmonic interference. Or something. It's all a load of bollocks really. He made no references to MP3 players, just headphones. In the context he put it in, a CD player and an MP3 player are no different: they both use headphones. He also said that "headphones are not as bad [as ear buds]" because they are over a wider area.
I should make something clear: He has shown himself to be rather stupid at times and is a horrible teacher. I have no doubt that he is wrong about this.
|
|
« Last Edit: May 28, 2009, 09:13:25 pm by jaychant »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draxas
Enlightened
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1044
|
I think if you substitute "high volume" for "low quality", his statements make perfect sense in every case. Concerts, especially at small venues like bars, tend to be much louder than necessary. And earbuds can also seem louder than headphones when set to the same volume, because the buds are placed inside the ear canal.
Why he insists on referring to this as "low quality" is a mystery, though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
|
|
|
|